Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 01:06

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The FDA Launches Its Generative-AI Tool, Elsa, Ahead of Schedule - Gizmodo
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
‘It Is Going to Happen’: JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Warns of Crack in the Bond Market - Barron's
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the reason behind the Russian government's negative view on foreign travel?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Scientists learn how mosquitoes outsmart and evade human defenses - Earth.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Walmart Nintendo Switch 2: it was in stock and will be back next week - The Shortcut | Matt Swider
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Apple drops a spot on 2025 Fortune 500 list - 9to5Mac
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Can This Blue Chemical Really Boost Your Brain? Here's What We Know. - ScienceAlert
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.